Showing posts with label Historical Marker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Historical Marker. Show all posts

Monday, March 21, 2011

Vandalism and Rumors of Vandalism

My educational background is in political science. I have been trained when I write to be careful to present only facts, or at least what can be presented as facts. It was politics after all. So as an historian, amateur or otherwise, I am hesitant to report rumors as they can be misinterpreted as fact. Not that I think that my readers are too unsophisticated to distinguish fact from rumor, but that I will unconsciously assert that what I am saying is true, even if the evidence is not complete.

But, in my personal research, I have found that rumors, far from being misleading, can be enlightening. Much of what happened to Mormons in the post Civil War South, was fed by rumor. If I wanted to understand why Mormons were treated the way they were, ignoring rumors would be like seeing a movie with half the screen blocked. So I listen to rumors, and sometimes I pass them along.

So rumor has it that the missing historical marker for the Cane Creek massacre has been found. A tip led a Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) crew, to a bridge crossing the Buffalo River about six miles south of the city of Hohenwald. The sign’s original location was about 13 miles north of where it was found. It had been thrown into the river from the bridge. The TDOT crew waded out into the river and retrieved the sign. But the sign has not yet made it back into the hands of the Historical Commission, and I have not been able to get confirmation that the sign has indeed been found.

A representative for the Tennessee Historical Commission (THC) believes that because of how the sign was broken off, it is probably not repairable. It was made from cast aluminum (not iron as I once thought) at a foundry in Ohio - Sewah Studios. Although there are processes for reattaching the broken off piece of the sign to its base, I am told by friends accustomed to working with aluminum that such a repair would be difficult, and the results may not be satisfactory. In addition it might not be cheaper than replacing the sign altogether. And even if it is less expensive and a local foundry could be found to perform the work, there is still no money in this years’ THC budget for the repair.

So to make a long story short, even if the sign has been found, it still will have to be replaced.

I also find the speculation about the culprits and their motivation fascinating. Before it was found some wondered if it someone would try to sell it for scrap metal, an option I had not considered, mostly because the sign would have been easily identified. Other suggestions were more in the line of what I was thinking; someone didn't like what the sign said. To be fair, I've never run into anyone who thought the sign should disappear; only people who thought others might want to help it do so.

But it was who people thought might do such a thing the fascinated me most. Suggestions to their identity were as varied as juveniles with rich parents and too much time on their hands, to relatives of those who ran the Mormons off 125 years ago, to members of the TDOT crew that found the sign. I find little value in such speculation. Except in that it tells us a little bit about the speculator. I certainly don’t believe members of the TDOT crew that retrieved the sign had anything to do with it. But the person who suggested the possibility was a longtime LDS resident whose family has experienced more than their share of anti-Mormon bias. So it might be a little paranoid, but perhaps understandably so. In the massacre that the sign describes, some people in the mob were the very ones who should have been protecting them; among them a deputy sheriff, and a prominent local physician.

While several signs have been vandalized in the area, and the culprits’ motivations are not really known, it probably doesn’t matter. In a county with about twelve thousand residents, it takes just a handful to perpetuate this kind of damage. Despite what happened more than 125 years ago, Lewis County is a great place to live. And stealing a sign doesn't compare to some of the things being done to Mormons and Mormon structures elsewhere, even today. But that is the subject for another day.

Monday, March 7, 2011

To see what was left of the marker

Last week I reported that the historical marker for the Cane Creek Massacre had gone missing. Well, here is what is left. And soon even that will be gone. The Tennessee Department of Transportation is goin to remove the pole and someday, but not this year, it will get replaced.

To give you an idea of scale the post is about 4 inches thick. The sign was made of cast iron, and appears to have been snapped off with a considerable amount of force.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Cane Creek Historical Marker

Yesterday, I spoke with a friend who lives on Cane Creek Road in Lewis County. She told me that the historical marker for the Cane Creek massacre is missing. Now, there are a few possible explanations. It could have been knocked or blown down. Tennessee does have tornado problems. But there hasn't been a tornado through there and there is no damage to the surrounding area. Plus the post is still there, which means it wasn't knocked down by a car. In addition there are parts of the sign still attached to the metal post, which means it wasn't removed by someone with the proper tools. Call me paranoid, but I think it was vandalized. I'm heading up there this weekend to get a photo myself. I'm also contacting the Tennessee Historical Commission.

The sign is the second placed by the historical society, the first was placed in 1966 at a small pull-over spot along the main highway. There was even a picnic bench at the first spot. But according to one local resident it was knocked down and was missing for a long time. The Historical Commission records show the sign was replaced only once in May 1996. At the same time the sign was moved to the intersection of Cane Creek Road and Hwy 41; closer to the Conder farm but with no place to pull over and read it. The sign reads:

TENNESSEE'S MORMON MASSACRE

One-half mile west on August 10, 1884, at a farmhouse on the east fork of Cane Creek several Mormon missionaries and their followers were attacked by a mob of disguised citizens. Killed were two missionaries, Elders William S. Berry and John H. Gibbs, two of their local associates, Martin Conder and J. R. Hudson; and one of the mob. The fight was caused primarily because of local opposition to the practice of plural marriage by the Mormon Church.

Tennessee Historical Commission